R Bray, A Gaevskaya - Bathymonorchis polyipni reimer 1985 n g n comb digenea monorchiidae from bathypelagic fishes of the eastern mid-atlantic ocean - страница 1

Страницы:
1 

Systematic Parasitology 26: 91-95, 1993.

© 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

Bathymonorchis polyipni (Reimer, 1985) n. g., n. comb. (Digenea: Monorchiidae) from bathypelagic fishes of the eastern mid-Atlantic Ocean

Rodney A. Bray1 and Albina V. Gaevskaya2

'Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW 7 5BD, UK ^Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2, Nakhimov St., Sevastopol 335000, Ukraine

Accepted for publication 28th October, 1992 Abstract

The new genus Bathymonorchis is defined and differentiated from the genera Monorchis and Allolasi-otocus. B. polyipni (Reimer) n. comb., previously attributed to Monorchis, is described from Neoscopelus macrolepidotus and Polymetme corythaeola from the Atlantic off the coast of NW Africa. The new genus is characterised by its single vitelline field, multilobate ovary, spinous blind portion of Looss' organ, lack of external seminal vesicle, testicular position and uterine configuration.

Introduction

It has been shown that there are relatively few endemic digeneans in meso- and bathypelagic fish species (Noble & Collard, 1970; Gartner & Zwerner, 1989), but in this paper we report the presence of a new genus of monorchiid digenean from myctophiform and salmoniform mid-water species.

Materials and methods

The specimens were fixed flattened or unflattened in formalin, stained by various methods and mounted in Canada balsam. Serial sections were stained in eosin and Mayer's haemalum and mounted in thin Canada balsam. Measurements are quoted in micrometres throughout as the range with the mean in parentheses.

Family Monorchiidae Odhner, 1911

Subfamily Monorchiinae Odhner, 1911 Genus Bathymonorchis n. g.

Definition

Monorchiidae, Monorchiinae. Body fusiform. Te­gument spinous. Oral sucker subglobular, subter-minal. Prepharynx usually visible. Pharynx small. Oesophagus short to long. Intestinal bifurcation in mid-forebody. Caeca long, terminate blindly well into hindbody. Ventral sucker rounded, in anterior half of body. Testis one; elongate-oval; lateral, in posterior third of body. Cirrus-sac large. Seminal vesicle internal; saccular. Pars pro-statica narrow. Ejaculatory duct wide, lined with long, narrow spines. Genital pore ventro-median, in posterior forebody. Ovary multilobate, lateral at level of ventral sucker. Uterine seminal recep­tacle present. Uterus coiled throughout hindbody, enters middle of Looss' organ. Looss' organ large, spined in blind and distal parts. Vitellarium follic­ular; follicles large, in single field across posterior

half of forebody. Excretory pore terminal; vesicle not seen.

Type-species: Bathymonorchis polyipni (Reimer, 1985) n. comb.

Bathymonorchis polyipni (Reimer, 1985) n. comb.

(Figs 1-2)

Synonym: Monorchis polyipni Reimer, 1985. Material studied

ex Neoscopelus macrolepidotus Johnson, Neosco-pelidae, Myctophiformes. Rectum. Atlantic Ocean off Western Sahara (23-27° N, 13-17° W, depth 590-600m, March 1974). Collector: A.V. Gaevskaya. BM(NH) Reg. No. 1981.12.3.10. ex Polymetme corythaeola (Alcock), Photichthyi-dae, Salmoniformes. Intestine. Atlantic Ocean off Morocco (34° N, 09° W, depth 360-408 m, 14 Jan­uary 1971). Collector: R.A. Bray. BM(NH) Reg. No. 1981.12.3.11.

Description

Based on 16 flattened specimens from TV. macrole­pidotus, 2 of which were subsequently sectioned, and one unflattened from P. corythaeola, also sub­sequently sectioned. Measurements on 14 speci­mens from N. macrolepidotus.

Body fusiform, widest at level of ventral sucker; 1,640-2,650 x 630-920 (2,281 x 801) (Fig. 1). Width 24-52 (36)% of length. Tegument spinous throughout; spines more widely spaced in hind­body (but lost in several specimens). Oral sucker subterminal; subglobular; walls thin; 142­185 x 125-194 (157 x 168). Ventral sucker rounded; muscular walls thin; 178-220 x 158-209 (203 x 188). Sucker-ratio 1:0.95-1.42 (1.13). Forebody 26-44 (34)% of body-length. Prephar-ynx usually distinct, occasionally not visible; 0-38 (16). Pharynx oval; small; 70-101 x 61-82 (82 x 67). Oral sucker: pharynx width ratio 1:0.36-0.50 (0.40). Oesophagus long, narrow; 95­310 (231). Intestinal bifurcation in mid-forebody; 201-448 (315) from ventral sucker. Caeca narrow; reach to mid-hindbody or just beyond; terminate blindly; posterior extremity obscured by eggs in whole-mounts.

Excretory pore terminal. Vesicle obscured by eggs, even in sectioned specimens.

Testis single; longitudinally elongate-oval; mar­gin may be indented by configuration of adjacent uterus; in posterior third of body, lying close to left or right lateral margin, usually on opposite side of body to ovary (on same side in one speci­men), occasionally difficult to see in specimens replete with eggs; 340-630 x 89-159 (479 x 123). Cirrus-sac large; claviform; lying dorsally or later­ally to ventral sucker, reaching into anterior hind­body; 310-492 x 83-140 (396 x 106) (Fig. 2). Seminal vesicle internal; oval, saccular. Pars pro-statica narrow; surrounded by large irregular gland-cells. Ejaculatory duct distinct, wide; lined with numerous, distally pointing, narrow, fila­mentous spines of up to 80 long. Genital atrium distinct, tubular. Genital pore median; close to anterior margin of ventral sucker.

Ovary multilobate, longitudinally elongate-oval; lies laterally, either sinistrally or dextrally, at level of ventral sucker or just anterior; 127— 460 x 61-120 (254 x 92). Laurer's canal appar­ently runs posteriorly from ovary; dorsal aperture not seen. Proximal coils of uterus form uterine seminal receptacle. Uterus extensive; coils fill most of hindbody and may reach into lateral re­gions of posterior forebody. Eggs numerous; small, 19-23 x 9-14 (21 x 12); tanned; opercu-late. Looss' organ claviform; widest proximally; with thicker wall distally; 145-234 x 76-108 (200 x 92); lined with numerous filamentous spines of up to 70 long in blind proximal portion and up to 50 long in distal portion. Uterus enters Looss' organ at about middle of median margin (Fig. 2). Vitellarium follicular; follicles large, irre­gular with tendency to be elongate longitudinally; in single field reaching across posterior half of forebody; ventral to caeca and oesophagus; reach­ing to about mid-oesophagus, 39-228 (118) from pharynx.

Measurements of single specimen from P. cory­thaeola (taken prior to sectioning): Body 1,475 x 420. Width 28% of length. Oral sucker 114 x 142. Ventral sucker 145 x 159. Sucker-ratio 1:1.12. Forebody 32% of body length. Prephar-

Figs 1-2. Bathymonorchis polyipni (Reimer) n. comb, from Neoscopelus macrolepidotus. 1. Ventral view of flattened worm. 2. Terminal genitalia. Scale-bars: 1, 500 \i.m; 2, 200 \x.m.

ynx not seen. Pharynx 71 x 44. Oral sucker: phar­ynx ratio 1:0.31. Oesophagus at least 135; intesti­nal bifurcation obscured by eggs. Testis obscured by eggs. Cirrus-sac 340 x 75. Looss' organ 165 x 74. Ovary 138 long, width obscured by eggs. Eggs 21-22 x 12-16.

Type-host and locality: Polyipnus spinosus, Indian Ocean, Mozambique Channel. Records: 1. Reimer (1985); 2. Present study. Definitive hosts: Neoscopelidae: Neoscopelus mac­rolepidotus (2). Photichthyidae: Polymetme [or Yarella] corythaeola (1,2). Sternoptychidae: Po­lyipnus spinosus (1).

Distribution: FAO Fisheries Areas 34 Atlantic, E Central [off Western Sahara (2), off Morocco (2)], 51 Indian Ocean, W [Mozambique Channel (1)].

Discussion

The family Monorchiidae includes well in excess of 50 described genera, whose relationships and supra-generic systematics are not well worked out. The family is considered polyphyletic by Brooks, O'Grady & Glen (1985), and Cable (1974) con­sidered some of the freshwater forms to be closer to the marine zoogonids than to the marine monorchiids. The latest summaries of the syste­matics of the family are by Mamaev (1968) and Yamaguti (1971). Mamaev (1968) discussed the history of the family, the status of the subfamilies proposed by various authors and reviewed some of the characters, stating, for example, that the number of testes (one or two) is not a subfamily character and that the point of entry of the uterus into Looss' organ is not a generic character.

We have examined all described genera and have found our new genus to be closest to Monorchis Looss, 1902 and Allolasiotocus Yama­guti, 1959.

Bathymonorchis differs from Monorchis spp. in the following characters: (1) vitellarium in a single field rather than two separated fields; (2) ovary multilobate rather than globular, lobed or irregu­lar; and (3) spines present in blind proximal por­tion of Looss' organ. In addition to specimens of

Monorchis monorchis (Stossich, 1890), we have consulted the descriptions of Monorchis monorchis [syn: M. parvus Looss, 1909] by Naid-enova & Gaevskaya (1978) and Radujkovic, Orec-chia & Paggi (1989), of M. hermanni Issa, 1963 by Issa (1963), of M. japonicus Zhukov, 1970 by Zhukov (1970), of M. minutus Madhavi, 1977 by Madhavi (1977), of M. diplovarium Mamaev, 1970 by Mamaev (1970), of M. heterorchis Bilqees, 1980 by Bilqees (1981) and of M. fusi-formis Wang, 1982 by Wang (1982).

Bathymonorchis differs from Allolasiotocus spp. by the following characters: (1) lack of an external seminal vesicle; (2) vitellarium in a single field rather than two separated fields; (3) testis close to posterior extremity rather than adjacent to ovary and ventral sucker; (4) bulk of uterus pre-testicular rather than post-testicular; (5) lack of a three-chambered genital atrium lined with 'bristles'; and (6) ovary multilobate rather than irregular or with few lobes. We have consulted the descriptions of Allolasiotocus nibeae Yama­guti, 1959 of Yamaguti (1959) and A. pseudoscia-enae Wang, 1982 of Wang (1982).

The species Monorchis polyipni Reimer, 1985 was described from two teleost species of the order Salmoniformes from the Indian Ocean in the Mozambique Channel (between 21°06' and 24°54' S, depth 420-605 m) (Reimer, 1985). Our specimens show slight, but insignificant, differ­ences to Reimer's description. Professor Reimer kindly lent us three specimens of M. polyipni which, on examination, were found to be practi­cally indistinguishable from our specimens. The oesophagus, which appeared to be shorter judging by Reimer's description, was seen clearly in only one of Reimer's contracted specimens, but in that case it measured 167 long. The contracted con­dition of the Indian Ocean worms also, we be­lieve, contributes to the apparent difference in the anterior extent of the vitellarium.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Professor L. Reimer of the University of Rostock, Germany, for the loan of

A пё* monorchiid genus from bathypelagic fishes 95

specimens. The visit of AVG to Britain was partly funded by The Royal Society. We would like to thank Dr D.I. Gibson for reading the manuscript and Mr D.W. Cooper for the preparation of serial sections.

References

Bilqees, F.M. (1981) Digenetic trematodes of fishes of Karachi coast. Karachi: Kifayat Academy, 207 pp.

Brooks, D.R., O'Grady, R.T. & Glen, D.R. (1985) Phylogen-etic analysis of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria) with comments on their adaptive radiation. Canadian Jour­nal of Zoology, 63, 411-443.

Cable, R.M. (1974) Phylogeny and taxonomy of trematodes with reference to marine species. In: W.B. Vernberg (Ed.) Symbiosis in the sea. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 173-193.

Gartner, J.V. Jr & Zwerner, D.E. (1989) The parasite faunas of meso- and bathypelagic fishes of Norfolk Submarine Can­yon, western North Atlantic. Journal of Fish Biology, 34, 79-95.

Issa, G.I. (1963) A new species of Monorchis (Trematoda: Monorchidae) from the gilt-head fish of the Mediterranean Sea. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Wash­ington, 30, 29-31.

Madhavi, R. (1977) Some new digenetic trematodes (Monor­chiidae) from marine fishes of Waltair coast, Bay of Bengal. In: R. Lamothe-Argumedo, R. etal. (Eds) Excerta Parasito-logica en Memoria del Doctor Eduardo Caballero у Cabal­lero. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico 233-246.

Mamaev, Y.L. (1968) [Evaluation of up-to-date classification systems of the Monorchidae.] In [Papers on helminthology presented to Academician К J. Skrjabin on his 90th birthday.] Moscow. Izdatel'stvo Nauk Akademii SSSR, 239-243 (In Russian).

Mamaev, Y.L. (1970) [Helminths of fishes of the Gulf of Tong

King.] In: Oshmarin, P.G., Mamaev, Y.L. & Lebedev, B.I.

(Eds) [Helminths of animals of south-eastern Asia.] Moscow:

Izdatel'stvo Nauka, 127-190 (In Russian). Naidenova, N.N. & Gaevskaya, A.V. (1978) Revision of some

trematode species - parasites of the Black Sea fishes. Biolo-

giya Morya, Kiev, 45, 49-56 (In Russian). Noble, E.R. & Collard, S.B. (1970) The parasites of midwater

fishes. In Snieszko, S.F. (Ed.) A symposium on diseases

of fishes and shellfishes. American Fisheries Society Special

Publication, 5, 57-68. Radujkovic, B.M., Orecchia, P. & Paggi, L. (1989) Parasites

des poissons marins du Montenegro: Digenes. Acta Adriat-

(СЛ..30. 137-187. Reimer, L.W. (1985) Zwei neue Arten der Monorchiidae (Di­genea) aus Fischen der Strasse von Mocambique. Ange-

wandte Parasitologic 26, 225-228. Wang, P.-q. (1982) Some digenetic trematodes of marine fishes

from Fujian Province, China. Oceanologia et Limnologia

Sinica, 13, 179-194 (In Chinese). Yamaguti, S. (1959) Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan.

Part 54. Trematodes of fishes, XIII. Publication of the Seto

Biological Laboratory, 7, 241-262. Yamaguti, S. (1971) Synopsis of digenetic trematodes of verteb­rates. Tokyo: Keigaku Publishing Company. Vol. 1, 1,074

pp: Vol. 2, 349 plates. Zhukov, E.V. (1970) New species of trematodes and mono-

geneans from marine fishes of Posjet Bay (the Sea of Japan).

Parazitologiya, 4, 321-326 (In Russian).

Страницы:
1 


Похожие статьи

R Bray, A Gaevskaya - Bathymonorchis polyipni reimer 1985 n g n comb digenea monorchiidae from bathypelagic fishes of the eastern mid-atlantic ocean